home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.halcyon.com!usenet
- From: Glen Parker <glenebob@halcyon.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.os.msdos.programer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
- Subject: Re: fastest code
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 11:07:14 -0800
- Organization: Computer Systems Contracting
- Message-ID: <31641DE2.31D4@halcyon.com>
- References: <316112A2.7D37@public.sta.net.cn> <31611AC9.7DE1@wight.hursley.ibm.com> <3162c21a.6084138@204.248.25.97>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: blv-pm2-ip29.halcyon.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (WinNT; I)
-
- William E. Kempf wrote:
- >
- > Max Waterman <dwater@wight.hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
- >
- > :Xu Yifeng wrote:
- > :> I'd like to know which C/C++ compiler generate fastest code?
- > :> Borland, Microsoft, Watcom, High or Symantec?
- > :
- > :The Cray C compiler would probably generate the fastest code.
- > :
- > :Max.
- > :--
- > : ___ mailto:max@lton.u-net.com
- > : / / / _ / / _ __ __ _ __ _
- > : / / / /_/ |/ / / / /_/ / /_ /_/ / / / /_/ /| /
- > :/ / / / / /| /_/_/ / / / /_ / | / / / / / / |/
- >
- > No, it may run faster because the Cray computer is faster, but that
- > doesn't mean it is faster code (Big-O notation kinda thing) :-).
- >
- > -----
- > William E. Kempf : http://www.novia.net/~srwillrd
- > "Sir Willard" : mailto:srwillrd@novia.net (home)
- > Knight of the Ascii Table : mailto:wekempf@marlton.1dc.com (work)
-
-
- If you run a c-compiler on a faster computer,
- wouldn't it make faster code? Or code faster? Now
- I'm confused
-
-
-